EVE Search - What would happen if CCP finally nerfed hisec?

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

What would happen if CCP finally nerfed hisec?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 5 post(s)
Caldari Citizen 1897289768188 State War Academy Caldari State 474	Posted - 2014.02.04 18:38:00 - [1] - Quote La Nariz wrote: E-2C Hawkeye wrote: Any numbers or information beyond the fact of being irrelevant would mean even less should they be provided by you. All the testing from both sides still wonGÇÖt change a thing. All your crying on the forums wonGÇÖt change the fact CCP nerfed null-sec income. Should CCP have the numbers they felt they needed to nerf hi-sec. Should they come out tomorrow and decide to nerf hi-sec guess what?..... still wonGÇÖt change a thing. We will have to either accept it and continue to sub and play or not. Again itGÇÖs just THAT simple. Choose the part of the sandbox you want to play in or unsub and pick your crying towel up and go home. So why is any information I provide meaningless? You're constantly telling me to unsub and stop posting, why is that? I provided all the tools you'd need to do exactly as I did and get numbers. The data does not lie and it shows highsec is making more than nullsec. E: To again avoid the derail, this highsec pubbie continually attempts to do. La Nariz wrote: Highsec L4s : ~100m Forsaken Hubs: ~70m (no ESS) The ESS test is still going because I got ganked and there's a tonne of roaming gangs going around. Proof and verification of fit: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqC-BTui2uSGdDlxa2dWOG5ieHB0QXBVWW82bGN5TFE&usp=sharing http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=21728022 That test shows in mid-range PVE activity highsec is not adhering to risk : reward at all and that needs to be changed. E1: Have to acquire an ESS. All activity reward excluding market activity should be Nullsec/WH > lowsec > highsec. So how do we nerf highsec to get it back in line? The information provided or gathered will always be flawed. Anyone with a basic high school education will be able to know, see or even predict this. This should be obvious even more so to someone like yourself with a self proclaimed scientific testing back ground. You are missing several key elements to test with. The first being a controlled environment. This is a sandbox with many variables to effect testing. You are also missing Establishment/Desirability of repeatability/Attribute Agreement Analysis for Defect Databases/Accuracy/Accuracy and Precision/Reproducibility to name a few. The most important item you lack thatGÇÖs not even scientific in nature is CREDABILITY of which you are -10. This is why you are wasting your time. Then again I guess rocket scientist have plenty of that.
Caldari Citizen 1897289768188 State War Academy Caldari State 474	Posted - 2014.02.04 21:27:00 - [2] - Quote La Nariz wrote: E-2C Hawkeye wrote: La Nariz wrote: E-2C Hawkeye wrote: Any numbers or information beyond the fact of being irrelevant would mean even less should they be provided by you. All the testing from both sides still wonGÇÖt change a thing. All your crying on the forums wonGÇÖt change the fact CCP nerfed null-sec income. Should CCP have the numbers they felt they needed to nerf hi-sec. Should they come out tomorrow and decide to nerf hi-sec guess what?..... still wonGÇÖt change a thing. We will have to either accept it and continue to sub and play or not. Again itGÇÖs just THAT simple. Choose the part of the sandbox you want to play in or unsub and pick your crying towel up and go home. So why is any information I provide meaningless? You're constantly telling me to unsub and stop posting, why is that? I provided all the tools you'd need to do exactly as I did and get numbers. The data does not lie and it shows highsec is making more than nullsec. E: To again avoid the derail, this highsec pubbie continually attempts to do. La Nariz wrote: Highsec L4s : ~100m Forsaken Hubs: ~70m (no ESS) The ESS test is still going because I got ganked and there's a tonne of roaming gangs going around. Proof and verification of fit: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqC-BTui2uSGdDlxa2dWOG5ieHB0QXBVWW82bGN5TFE&usp=sharing http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=21728022 That test shows in mid-range PVE activity highsec is not adhering to risk : reward at all and that needs to be changed. E1: Have to acquire an ESS. All activity reward excluding market activity should be Nullsec/WH > lowsec > highsec. So how do we nerf highsec to get it back in line? The information provided or gathered will always be flawed. Anyone with a basic high school education will be able to know, see or even predict this. This should be obvious even more so to someone like yourself with a self proclaimed scientific testing back ground. You are missing several key elements to test with. The first being a controlled environment. This is a sandbox with many variables to effect testing. You are also missing Establishment/Desirability of repeatability/Attribute Agreement Analysis for Defect Databases/Accuracy/Accuracy and Precision/Reproducibility to name a few. The most important item you lack thatGÇÖs not even scientific in nature is CREDABILITY of which you are -10. This is why you are wasting your time. Then again I guess rocket scientist have plenty of that. You didn't answer the question. So why is any information I provide meaningless? You're constantly telling me to unsub and stop posting, why is that? How am I missing those things you claim I am missing? Considering I can see who has and has not looked at the sheet I am going to predict you are prejudiced and full of "grr goons," to the point you cannot help but, contort with rage at the mere sight of a goon. E: Oh yeah life scientist not rocket scientist. E2: I'll even give you a hand at answering the questions all you need to do is copy these sentences then fill in the ~ with your own words. All the information you provide is meaningless because ~. I am constantly telling you to unsub and stop posting because ~. You are missing X because ~. La Nariz I provided very specific answers to your question as to why any data you collected would be erroneous. The first of which isnGÇÖt even a technical reason. First you have ZERO credibility stemming from your inability to conduct testing from a non biased view point. Next would be for a more specific technical nature. I listed several KEY areas you are missing. The biggest is an inability to provide a controlled testing environment. (sandbox) Next I listed more specific key features Establishment/Desirability of repeatability/Attribute Agreement Analysis for Defect Databases/Accuracy/Accuracy and Precision/Reproducibility. Just to name a few to include but not limited to the before mentioned parameters. Please feel free to look these up or Google them as I feel certain you have no clue what they are. I truly hope your lack of understanding why your information will be meaningless is a poor attempt at trolling. Scientist my AZZ.
Caldari Citizen 1897289768188 State War Academy Caldari State 474	Posted - 2014.02.04 21:29:00 - [3] - Quote Mallak Azaria wrote: La Nariz wrote: You didn't answer the question. So why is any information I provide meaningless? You're constantly telling me to unsub and stop posting, why is that? Because he knows he would be proven wrong & we can't have that now can we. I answered it very specific. Because you closed your eyes stuck your fingers in your ears and went nahhh nahh nahh is not my problem.

Copyright © 2006-2025, Chribba - OMG Labs. All Rights Reserved. - perf 0,08s, ref 20250926/1053
EVE-Online™ and Eve imagery © CCP.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.